William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
COMMENT: In the immortal words of that great philosopher, George Gobel, wait a gosh-darned second. So, the way it appears, the U.S. "promises" to take a harder line on Iran "in return" for Israeli concessions on settlements. Do I have that right? Israel had to, basically, force the U.S. to take a harder line on Iran? Isn't a harder line, and possibly more, in the American national interest? Do these parlor-party "intellectuals" around Obama really believe that America isn't Iran's ultimate target? If this story is true, and it appears to be well sourced, it says something awful about American foreign policy under this head-in-the-sand administration. It says that the only time we'll take a truly realistic stand against our adversaries is if someone forces us to do it. Of course, it's possible that the Obamans just can't find the time to take hard action against Iran, so busy are they investigating our intelligence people. You know, there are priorities, dearie. This story follows a number of notes in the media expressing a growing cynicism about Obama's foreign policy. We will watch carefully. We share the cynicism. August 26, 2009
|
|